1 Judith Mayne, Framed: Lesbians, Feminists, and Media Culture (Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press, 2000), xviii.
2 See Marcia Landy and Amy Villarejo, Queen Christina (London: BFI Publish-
ing, 1995).
3 Denise Riley, Am I That Name? Feminism and the Category of Woman in His-
tory (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988); and Judith Butler,
Gender Trouble (London: Routledge, 1989).
4 See Lisa Duggan, Sapphic Slashers: Sex, Violence and American Modernity
(Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2000).
5 Eric Clarke examines the various routes through which commodification
functions to integrate excluded groups into ‘‘publicness’’ or ‘‘publicity,’’ in
his Virtuous Vice: Homoeroticism and the Public Sphere (Durham, N.C.: Duke
University Press, 2000).
6 For a more extended discussion of my sense of Foucault’s History of Sexu-
ality project and its importance for queer theory, see my ‘‘Queer Film and
Performance, In Theory,’’ GLQ 7, 2 (2001): 313–33.
7 Biddy Martin, ‘‘Sexualities Without Genders and Other Queer Utopias,’’ in
her collection, Femininity Played Straight: The Significance of Being Lesbian
(London: Routledge, 1996), 93.
8 Peggy Phelan, ‘‘Dying Man with a Movie Camera. Silverlake Life: The View
From Here,’’ GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 2, 4 (1995): 390–91.
9 Here it may be useful to distinguish between my project and that of an-
other writer interested in lesbian identities through a Marxist grid: Rose-
mary Hennessey’s Profit and Pleasure: Sexual Identities in Late Capitalism
(New York: Routledge, 2001). Hennessey is impatient with the extent to
which queer theory influenced by poststructuralism deploys a diminished
understanding of sociality, and of capitalist exploitation more particularly.
As corrective, she wants to develop a critical practice of ‘‘making visible,’’ of
rendering clearly the relationships between contemporary lesbianisms, their
cultural products, and the reality of the social structures ‘‘they are shaped by
Previous Page Next Page